What's all this talk about GASB Statement 34?
In June 1999 the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) approved
one of the most significant financial reporting requirements in its history.
For the first time, governments will show all available resources
and costs associated with those resources to provide for public
services. More than 84,000 local jurisdictions, including state and
local governments, will be affected. Statement Number 34 requires
that state and local governments begin reporting on the value of
their infrastructure assets and depreciate them over their useful
life
Infrastructure assets are defined as long-lived capital
assets that normally are stationary in nature and normally can be
preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital
assets. (i.e. roads, bridges, tunnels, dams, lighting systems, and water
and sewer facilities.) Buildings, except those that are an ancillary part
of a network of infrastructure assets, should not be considered.
Statistics concerning local resouces:
- Local roads represent 75% of the four million miles of
U. S. roadways.
- 27% of the 159,000 bridges in the U.S. are on local
collector roads
- 26% of the $ 100 billion spent on U. S. roads and
bridges annually comes from local governments
- Local governments spend 34% of the annual budget for
U.S. roads and bridges
Implementation for (valuing and) reporting infrastructure assets is
based on annual revenues of the first fiscal year
after June 15, 1999:
- Phase I governments (total annual revenues of $100
million or more) will begin after June 15, 2001
- Phase II governments (total annual revenues of $10
million or more) will begin after June 15, 2002
- Phase III governments (total annual revenues under $ 10
million) will begin after June 15, 2003
These dates apply to newly acquired or built infrastructure.
Governments have four additional years to report all pre-existing
assets. Annual revenues are primary government's primary governmental
and enterprise funds, except for extraordinary items.
Smart Infrastructure Management = Quality Services for All Communities
In June 1999 the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) approved
one of the most significant financial reporting requirements in its history.
For the first time, governments will show all available resources
and costs associated with those resources to provide for public
services. More than 84,000 local jurisdictions, including state and
local governments, will be affected. Statement Number 34 requires
that state and local governments begin reporting on the value of
their infrastructure assets and depreciate them over their useful
life
Infrastructure assets are defined as long-lived capital
assets that normally are stationary in nature and normally can be
preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital
assets. (i.e. roads, bridges, tunnels, dams, lighting systems, and water
and sewer facilities.) Buildings, except those that are an ancillary part
of a network of infrastructure assets, should not be considered.
Information disclosed in financial statements will help governments and
its citizens:
- Assess government-wide financial positions to determine
if they have improved or deteriorated as a result of the year's
operations.
- Evaluate current-year revenues and see actual costs.
This evaluation will determine if revenues were sufficient to pay for
current-year services and will help users focus on the cost of providing
government services and see how those services are financed.
- Make more in-depth comparisons between governments and
evaluate efficiency and effectiveness
- See how the government finances its programs and
invests in capital assets to ensure quality infrastructure far into the
future.
- Be proactive in their preventative maintenance to
optimize the useful life of an asset, reducing the need for large
expenditures if a reactive approach were used.
- Make better-informed choices about the expenditures of
public funds and appropriate levels of taxation.
The new GASB 34 requirements will affect general funds, bond ratings and
special revenue funds and officials will be held accountable for what was
budgeted at the beginning of the year. One of the most interesting changes
has to do with the budget-to-actual comparisons. Budgeting includes both
original and final budgeted amounts, actual amounts, and variance. Now
users can see how the initial budgeted amounts were changed. Although
federal and state funding will continue to be available for
infrastructure, funding agencies will require better management practices
that results in more accurate data as a qualification to receive these
funds. Budgeted amounts are the most significant values in a governmental
unit.
In addition, the public wants to know how much governments spend on
infrastructure and how much they borrow to finance it. The public also
wants to know if governments are caring for the infrastructure that has
been built with public resources and if they are providing the needed
services to their community in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Get Ready ! You can take some of the necessary steps now!
Managing your community's resources doesn't have to be difficult. In
fact, over time, your whole community will see the cost savings and
improvements to the infrastructure and benefit from the quality of
services provided.
Many communities have been using an
asset maintenance and management system for years. Some systems are
used effectively and some are not. But, for those who have not yet
started, it's not too late. We can help you take the necessary steps
now. Fragmented software programs (i.e., Inventory Management, Work
Planning & Budgeting or Pavement Management) function
independently, but with CitiTech's integrated system, useful and
accurate information is maximized and can be shared with the entire
organization. Accurate data and good asset management planning is an
investment and will result in better decision making for your
community's future.
Most important, an effective asset maintenance and management system
allows you to view planned versus actual costs of labor, equipment and
materials needed for maintenance, preparing budgets and analyzing the
performance of actions taken.
Implementing an asset management system doesn't have to require a lot
of time and money. CitiTech Management Software was designed to be
flexible and affordable and grow as your changing needs grow.
Organizations that are small and with limited resources, can start with
the basic system and gradually add other modules as you need them. To
start automating your government's activities, just add a project, some
inventory (equipment and/or materials), and employees (labor costs). It's
that simple!
Now, you're ready to set up your asset plan! Identify your assets and
its condition. After that, it's just a matter of updating your maintenance
plan, preventative maintenance plan, and improvement/replacement plans
you've set forth for each asset. By doing this, you will always know the
condition of your assets and the costs of maintaining those assets. Let's
start by defining your estimated, asset-related costs of all
infrastructure assets by determining the following.
- Original cost of asset
- Condition assessment plan
- Preventative maintenance plan
- Estimated actual costs of reactive maintenance
- Estimated years and costs of improvements until replacement
- Estimated year and cost of replacement
To comply with GASB-34's objective of
managing infrastructure assets to optimize their useful life and reduce
maintenance costs, you'll need to:
- Establish an historical cost for the asset less its estimated
salvage value, then depreciate the asset
-- or --
- inventory and value all of your infrastructure assets
- think about what goes into keeping each of those assets
functional, such as routine maintenance, design and construction
through rehabilitation
- keep track of planned versus actual costs of maintaining and
preserving your infrastructure assets
- establish ratings and perform condition assessments based on an
approved measurement factors
GASB 34 provides two ways to assess public works assets:
- The "Depreciation Method" is the simplest but has its
drawbacks. This method does not account for maintenance efforts of
repair and upgrading infrastructure, which can add value. It does not
account for expenses and the effect they have on the useful life of the
facility. It only reports past costs. Depreciation costs are
determined by dividing the original cost of your asset by its useful
life, and then show the end result as an expense. This determines the
annual cost of the asset that can be depreciated each year. This method
would be used if the requirements in the modified approach are not met.
- The "Modified Valuation Method" presents a clearer picture and
offers communities the opportunity to report actual costs
incurred each year to maintain and preserve the quality of their assets
to include predictive maintenance, repair, restoration, and replacement
components. Governments may begin to use this method for reporting as
long as at least one complete condition assessment is available and
documented. Three guidelines must be followed to achieve this method:
- Maintain a current inventory of all infrastructure assets.
- Establish a condition rating to "evaluate and report on the
current condition of all assets at least every three years. "
Maintain the condition of that asset at a preferred rating, then
review and rate the condition of that asset. Document the planned
versus actual amounts resulting from the three most recent condition
assessments to include dates. Compare estimated amounts at the
beginning of the fiscal year with the amounts actually expensed for
each of the past five reporting periods
- "Estimate annual costs to maintain and preserve infrastructure
assets": Report the condition of your assets in your financial
statement, and indicate how this condition compares with the policy
you set forth. You also estimate and report (as an expense) all
expenditures made (except for additions and improvements) to maintain
the condition of your assets each year. Additions or improvements
should be capitalized since they increase the capacity or efficiency
of the asset rather than preserve the useful life of the assets.
(Depreciation is not reported.)
Note: A
third approach may allow your community
to avoid three-year inspection issues and still show stability in
maintaining financial results. To report, use the depreciation method and
all the requirements of the modified approach information in GASB 34's
Required Supplementary Information.
It's Report Card Time! Financial Managers Present
the "Big Picture".
For the first time, government financial managers will present the
"big picture" of its government-wide financial performance for the year
and, governments that are complying with GASB 34 requirements will receive a
qualified opinion from an auditor. Your government's reports should consist of:
- Management's discussion and analysis to
provide an overview of the government's financial activities. MD&A
should include a comparison of the current year to the prior year and
its analysis, both positive and negative, of significant changes in
funds and significant budget variances. Reasons for these changes and
any economic factors that may have played a role in these changes should
also be addressed. Emphasis should be placed on the current year. A
description of significant capital asset and long-term debt activity
during the year, including a discussion of commitments made for capital
expenditures, credit ratings, and debt limitations that may affect the
financing of planned facilities or services. Finally, present a
descriptive analysis of known facts or conditions that will have a
significant effect on the financial position or will impact results in
operation.
Note: If this is the first period that this Statement
is applied, governments are not required to restate prior periods
for purposes of providing the comparative data. When prior-year
information is available, a comparative analysis of government-wide data
will be presented.
During the transition period, governments should disclose a
description of the infrastructure assets being reported and of those
that are not.
If determining the actual historical cost of general infrastructure
assets is not practical, governments should report the estimated
historical cost for major general infrastructure assets that were
acquired or significantly reconstructed, or that received significant
improvements, in fiscal years ending after June 30, 1980. Historical
costs should be used if these type assets are acquired after the
effective dates of this Statement.
- Financial Statements - Statement of Activities include a government-wide financial statement to include net
assets and activities and a fund financial statement and notes to the
financial statements. Highlights concerning these Statements are noted below:
~ Government-wide Financial
Statement:
- Report individual functions of operations as the net (expense)
revenue to make taxpayers aware of the financial burden. It
will identify how each function of the government draws from the
general revenues or it's self-financing through fees and other aid.
- As a minimum, governments should report direct expenses (those
that are associated with a service, program or department.)
Governments are not required to allocate indirect expenses, such as
general government, support services, or administration to other
functions. If administrative overhead charges are reported as a
direct expense, this should be disclosed in the summary.
Note: All revenues are general revenues (and are
reported after total net expense of the government's functions) unless
they are required to be reported as program revenues.
- The statement should separately report three categories of
program revenues: charges for services, program-specific operating grants and contributions, and
program-specific capital grants and contributions.
Note: Earnings on endowments or permanent fund investments should be reported as
program revenues if restricted to a program identified in the agency's agreement.)
- Report as charges for services: revenues as a
result of transactions by customers who purchase, use, or directly
benefit from the goods, services, or privileges provided. These
can be fees for specific services, such as water use or garbage
pickup; licenses and permits; operating special assessments, such
as for special street lighting. Also reported are payments from
other governments that are exchange transactions, for example when
one county reimburses another for services.
- Report program-specific operating grants and
contributions, such as FEMA disaster grants, that are used either
for operating expenses or for capital expenditures of the
program.
- Report program-specific capital grants and
contributions, such as those used for capital purposes to
purchase, construct, or renovate capital assets associated with a
specific program should reported separately as general
revenues.
Note: "Special items"
are transactions or events
that are within the control of management events that are
either unusual in nature orinfrequent in occurrence and
should be reported separately at the end of the statement of
activities. "Extraordinary Items" are transactions or events that
are both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence and should be
reported separately at the end of the statement of activities (after
special items).
- Other notes to the financial statement
- Budget comparison schedules for the reporting period should present:
- the original budget - the first complete appropriated budget
- the final appropriated budget - the adjusted original budget
- actual inflows, outflows and balances stated on the government's
budgetary basis
- ~ Fund Financial Statements are used to
report governmental, proprietary and fiduciary funds to the extent
that they have activities that meet the criteria for using those
funds. This would be used to report additional and detailed
information about the primary government. The financial statements
required for governmental funds are: balance sheet and statement of
revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances.
- Required Supplementary Information (RSI) is
required to report infrastructure assets and details of your rating
system. (RSI is also required for those agencies using the modified
approach). This demonstrates whether resources were obtained and used in
accordance with the governments legally adopted budget. Agencies using
the modified approach should include a discussion of guidelines to
report infrastructure assets as set forth above in Item 2.
The disclosure should also include factors that significantly affect
trends in the information reported in the required schedules, such as
changes in:
- the measurement scale
- the basis for the condition measurement
- the condition assessment methods
- If there is a change in condition level, an estimate of the effect of
the change on the estimated amount to maintain and preserve those assets
for the current period should also be disclosed.
Note: Reporting for special-purpose governments engaged
only in business-type activities (such as utilities) should submit
financial statements, MD&A and other RSI.
- An easy-to-read, descriptive analysis on what issues,
decisions or conditions may have a significant effect on the financial
position (net assets), future services or results of operations
(revenues, expenses, and other changes in net assets). Comments should
distinguish between information pertaining to the primary government and
that of its component units. Professional judgment should be used as to
whether addressing comments based on the component unit is significant.
- Reporting of Capital Assets. (Infrastructure, land and
improvements to land, easements, buildings and building improvements,
vehicles, equipment, works of art and historical treasures, and all
other tangible and intangible assets that are used in operations and
that have initial useful lives extending beyond a single reporting
period.) Capital assets should be reported at historical cost (or
estimated historical cost) plus capitalized interest and ancillary
charges such as, freight charges, site preparation costs and
professional fees.
- Depreciation Method - Capital assets should be reported net of accumulated
depreciation in the statement of net assets. (Accumulated depreciation may be
reported on the face of the statement or disclosed in the notes.) Capital assets
should be depreciated over their useful lives unless they are either inexhaustible
assets such as land and land improvements.
Depreciation expense should be reported in the statement of
activities. Shared capital assets (for example, a facility that
houses the police department, the building inspector or the utility
office) should be ratably included in the direct expenses of the
appropriate functions
Capital outlays and maintenance of public works or sanitation
departments, for example, would be reported as a direct expense and, as
a separate line item in the statement of activities.
- Modified Approach Method - Do not report depreciation, nor
capitalize any of the money spent. Capital Assets, such as land or
infrastructure assets should be reported separately if the government has
a significant amount of these assets. Also report major classes of
assets, such as infrastructure, buildings and improvements, vehicles and
equipment. Governments are not required to restate prior periods for purposes
of providing the comparative data. Report, as an annual expense, all
monies spent to maintain or improve the condition of the assets.

Examples for Complying with GASB-34
Example: MD&A for those using the depreciation method:
(This example meets and exceeds what is required for the MD&A
statement.)
ABC City manages its streets using a pavement management system. ABC's City
policy is to maintain ___ percent of its streets at a pavement condition
index of at least ___ (on a 100 point scale) and no more than ___ percent
of its streets at a pavement condition index below ___. The most recent
assessment found that ABC's City streets were within the prescribed
parameters with ____ percent having a pavement condition index of ___ or
better and only ___ percent of the streets having a pavement condition
index below ___.
Example: Government Activities Analysis
(This table exceeds the minimum requirements. The use of this table was
based on professional judgement to help further explain the results of the
MD&A.)
ABC City's five largest programs - police, fire, public works,
education, and parks and recreation - as well as each program's net
cost (total cost less revenues generated by the activities). The net
cost shows the financial burden that was placed on ABC City's taxpayers by
each of these functions.
| ABC Government Activities |
| |
| |
Total Cost of Service |
Net Cost of Services |
| Total |
$xxx.x |
$xxx.x |
$xx.x |
$xx.x |
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
| Police Department |
$xxx.x |
$xx.x |
$xx.x |
$xx.x |
| Fire Department |
x.x |
x.x |
x.x |
x.x |
| Public Works |
xx.x |
xx.x |
x.x |
x.x |
| Education Department |
xx.x |
xx.x |
xx.x |
xx.x |
| Parks/Recreation |
x.x |
x.x |
x.x |
x.x |
| Others |
$xx.x |
$xx.x |
$xx.x |
$xx.x |
Required Supplementary Information
Example: Budget Comparison Schedule
(for Public Works & Sanitation Department only. The variance column is optional)
| ABC City Budgetary Comparison Schedule |
| General Fund |
| For the Year Ending December 31, 2001 |
| |
Budgeted Amounts |
Actual Amounts |
Variance with Final Budget |
Positive (Negative) |
| Public Works: |
|
|
|
|
| Public Works Administration |
$xxxxxx |
$xxxxxx |
$xxxxxx |
$xxxxxx |
| Street Maintenance |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
| Traffic Operations |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
| Mechanical Maintenance |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
| Sanitation Department: |
|
|
|
|
| Landfill Management |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
| Garbage Pickup |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
Example: Reporting with the Modified Approach:


Other ways your funding may be affected . . .
Water Infrastructure Network (WIN) has reported the need for "Clean
and Safe Water in the 21st Century). The National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requires communities be responsible for
maintaining clean water -- even the water that falls from the heavens
into your neighbor's sewer drain. If not, you may be slapped with a
heavy fine. These fines are used to help put on workshops to discuss and
evaluate issues on pollution.
Managing the discharge of pollutants into receiving waters will be a
must, i.e., catchbasins, storm drains, ditches and man-made channels.)
Educating the public in managing precious resources is key! High costs
to remedy the prevention of pollution in the community's waterways will
involve all the community. "No Dumping" signs is only one way.
Even though the deadline for permit coverage is March 10, 2003, many
Phase II governments will need to plan ahead. Three years is the maximum
amount of time to issue a general permit. Others may have less than
three years. You can start by gathering information required to receive
your permit by that date.
- inventory your stormwater facility infrastructure
- write a stormwater pollution protection plan to include inspection
and, establish six control measures
CMOM: A (soon-to-be) EPA requirement for sewer agencies
Capacity, Management Operation, and Maintenance (CMOM), an EPA
requirement, will become part of NPDES permit requirements. CMOM is
priority news for sewer agencies. Regulations will require that
collection systems be actively managed, conditions assessed with full
documentation and measurement of planned versus actual procedures for
repair, upgrades, etc. In addition, agencies must evaluate their needs
and put in place a technical and financial commitment for a long-range
system asset rehabilitation and replacement program.
Documentation will be required, and reported annually, in order to
apply for an NPDES permit
To avoid hefty fines, your CMOM plan should
include:
- Complete inventory of sewer system assets
.
- Guidelines and documentation for determining the condition of these
assets.
(Item 3 and 4 are where regulators will be looking and,
is referred to as "long-term spill mitigation". You'll need proof of
your agency's ability to plan and manage your system effectively for the
long-term. This is so that it has adequate capacity and remains in good
condition over the long-haul.)
- Procedures for determining short-term-and long-term repair and
upgrade needs with documentation of work completed versus work planned.
- Summary of planned needs for long-range system asset rehabilitation
and replacement. Also, documentation of technical and financial
commitment to do the job correctly.
A Total Solution
CitiTech Management Software (CMS) is a Total Solution.
It’s a fully integrated management system designed to meet the specific
needs of a public works or road department. But, it is more than just
software; it’s a system, a management tool. An essential part of that
system, in addition to software that works, is responsive support and HELP
when you need it. The best software in the world is worthless unless it's
adequately supported. We use the Internet extensively to provide the
highest possible level of support.
CitiTech Management Software will also help you comply with newly
mandated reporting requirements from the Government Accounting Standards
Board (GASB) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They are:
GASB-34 Statement; (CMOM) Capacity, Management Operation and Maintenance
and, (NPDES) the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. A
solution in meeting GASB-34, CMOM and NPDES requirements is putting in
place a good management system that tracks costs and evaluates work
performance.
GASB-34 requires city, county, and state governments to value their
fixed assets (bridges, roads, signs, buildings, etc.) depreciate them, and
track the costs to maintain them and/or perform regular condition
assessments.
Under NPDES, state and local governments can be held liable and sued by
the federal government for not acting to eliminate pollution contaminants
from various water sources.
CMOM is priority news for sewer agencies. Regulations will require that
collection systems be actively managed, conditions assessed with full
documentation and measurement of planned versus actual procedures for
repair.
Despite it's many features and functions, the software’s greatest
benefit is its "open architecture" and flexible design. It is a "data
collector" that not only performs its own many processes; it also shares
information with other systems, such as ArcView and ArcInfo. A modular,
integrated design supports additional functions (such as bar coding) being
added with minimal modification of core software. All new modules
instantly inherit the software’s integrated model.
Bottom-line... CitiTech Management Software is common sense,
simple-to-use, leading-edge software and continues to evolve. Today,
software must "Focus on the Future". That’s our objective... to provide
the most comprehensive software possible that meets the needs of today and
tomorrow.
Respectfully submitted,
Brian McKiernan
President